Your Player, Your Position: The RotoWire Rule Now Says What It Meant

Every year the same argument shows up in the group chat: RotoWire has your guy at tight end, MFL has him at wide receiver, and nobody can point to the line in the constitution that settles it. The line existed — "the commissioner will adjust the position as desired by the owner" — it just buried the important half of the sentence at the end.

So it now leads with it. When RotoWire and MFL list a player at different positions, the **owner** picks which of the two he carries. Not the commissioner, not whichever source loaded first. You ask, and the change lands before the upcoming week's kickoff.

The bigger clarification is the part that was never written down at all: that choice is not a one-time, season-long lock. A player the two sources disagree about is eligible at **both** positions for the entire season, and you can move him back and forth between them as often as you want. Ride him at tight end while the premium is worth it, slide him to receiver when your lineup math changes, slide him back in November. Each switch goes through the commissioner and takes effect before that week's kickoff, so the only real constraint is the deadline.

Two fences, because someone was going to ask. The only positions available are the ones MFL and RotoWire actually list — there is no third option hiding out there. And if both sources already agree on a player's position, there is nothing to choose; that is his position.

Ask Roger knows all of it now, too. The rules chat has a card on the position-change rule, and the constitution he answers from carries the clarified language.